![Illegal Aliens Accused of Child Rape Walk Free in Massachusetts—ICE Shut Out [WATCH]](https://parlerpulse.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/2025.01.25-07.07-rvmnews-67953683136cf-eH6zIx.jpeg)
Massachusetts is facing intense scrutiny for its repeated practice of releasing illegal aliens accused of heinous crimes, including aggravated child rape, despite detainers from Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE).
Fox News’ Bill Melugin recently reported on the disturbing trend, highlighting cases where suspects were set free by local authorities even after federal immigration officers intervened.
Melugin, embedded with an ICE unit, witnessed the arrest of four illegal aliens in Massachusetts, all charged with aggravated child rape.
Dennis Quaid’s #1 Warning for Americans
Each suspect was released the same day, with local jurisdictions ignoring ICE detainer requests. In one alarming case, a Guatemalan national accused of multiple counts of forcible and aggravated child rape was granted bail by Essex County authorities.
ICE Boston confirmed that their detainer request was ignored and they were not informed of the suspect’s release.
“I’ve covered a lot of illegal immigration-related stories around the country in recent years,” Melugin said.
“Massachusetts is the only state that frequently releases illegal aliens charged with aggravated child rape and refuses to cooperate with ICE on detainer requests for them. Even in other sanctuary states and cities, I almost never see a lack of cooperation for child rape.”
By completing the poll, you agree to receive emails from RVM News, occasional offers from our partners and that you’ve read and agree to our privacy policy and legal statement.
Melugin described a situation that unfolded during one of his recent embeds with ICE Boston.
“In this case, a Guatemalan charged with three counts of forcible child rape and three counts of aggravated child rape was released on bail by Essex County, Massachusetts. ICE Boston stated that their detainer request was ignored, and they were not notified of his release.”
The trend of releasing dangerous criminals without informing ICE has raised serious concerns among federal authorities and the public.
Melugin reported that, during a single morning with ICE Boston, agents arrested four illegal aliens charged with child rape—all of whom had been released by local jurisdictions despite ICE detainers.
The situation in Massachusetts stands out even among other sanctuary jurisdictions.
While some cities and states limit cooperation with ICE on lesser offenses, the refusal to detain individuals charged with severe crimes like child rape is unprecedented.
Melugin recounted his conversation with a Massachusetts law enforcement source, asking how suspects accused of multiple counts of aggravated child rape could be granted bail and released despite federal intervention.
The source’s six-word response summed up the troubling reality: “Welcome to the Commonwealth of Massachusetts.”
The issue has sparked calls for greater accountability from local law enforcement and state officials.
Critics argue that Massachusetts’ policies not only undermine federal immigration enforcement but also put public safety at risk by allowing dangerous individuals to go free.
Trump’s Border Czar, Tom Homan, and Attorney General Pam Bondi have long criticized sanctuary policies that hinder cooperation with federal authorities.
With the revelations from Melugin’s reporting, some are calling for immediate action to address the apparent loopholes in Massachusetts’ system.
While federal authorities continue to face challenges in enforcing immigration laws in sanctuary jurisdictions, the release of individuals charged with egregious crimes like child rape has ignited outrage.
The situation in Massachusetts raises questions about the balance between state autonomy and the need for coordinated efforts to protect communities from violent offenders.
Despite the obstacles, ICE remains committed to tracking and apprehending criminal aliens who pose a threat to public safety.
Melugin’s report underscores the critical role of federal immigration enforcement and the ongoing challenges posed by local policies that prioritize sanctuary status over cooperation with ICE.
As the debate over sanctuary laws continues, the cases in Massachusetts highlight the urgent need for clearer policies and stronger collaboration between state and federal agencies to prevent dangerous individuals from slipping through the cracks.
Read original article on RVM News Read More
